Mateen Hafeez / TNN
May 10, 2019, 05.32 AM IST
MUMBAI:
The Azad Maidan police, probing the Himalaya foot overbridge collapse
that killed seven, filed a 709-page chargesheet against Neeraj Desai,
director of the firm that audited the FOB for structural safety, on
Thursday.
The chargesheet says Desai, who is in
custody, did not carry out the structural audit professionally, and the
deck that crashed was not covered during the audit. The concrete
pavement of the FOB that runs across D N Road from CSMT collapsed at
7.33pm on March 14, killing six persons. One injured person died later.
Desai, director of D D Desai's Associated Engineering Consultants and
Analysts, was negligent during the audit and he knew that the bridge may
crash but he didn't inform the BMC, the chargesheet concluded, adding
that Desai's firm did not follow the Indian Road Congress manual (for
inspection of bridges) during the audit. In its report, Desai's firm
mentioned that the condition of the bridge was "good", but the FOB
collapsed.
The police said Desai did not ask Geo Dynamics, which
was subcontracted the Non Destructive Test (NDT), to carry out tests on
the entire bridge. The police have also got permission from BMC to
prosecute two of its employees in the case.
On July 4 and 6,
2017, two engineers from the firm (Geo Dynamics) carried out the
ultrasonic test, rebound hammer test and carbonisation test at 16 points
on the bridge to ascertain its strength. But they were not asked to
test the deck, the portion that collapsed.
"Ravi Kiran Vaidya,
owner of Geo Dynamics, in his statement before a magistrate has stated
his firm was not asked to carry out tests on the deck," said an officer.
Besides Vaidya, statements of two eyewitnesses-the owner of a snacks
stall and a taxi driver whose cab was severely damaged-have been
recorded before a magistrate under section 164 of CrPC, meaning the
statements will be treated as evidence during the trial.
While
the concrete slab and iron beam have been sent to VJTI for tests, its
reports are awaited. "The chargesheet does not contain any forensic
report since we have not got it yet. Forensic experts had visited the
spot, collected cement, iron and debris samples for analysis. When we
get the report, we will attach it with the supplementary chargesheet,"
added an officer.
The police submitted the chargesheet in the
case within 52 days of auditor Desai's arrest. Moreover, they have got
permission from BMC to prosecute two of its employees -Anil Patil (53), a
suspended civil executive engineer, and Sandeep Kakulte (44), an
assistant engineer-in the case."The BMC has sanctioned our application
to prosecute the two. We will submit a chargesheet against the two
officers soon," said DCP Abhishek Trimukhe.
While
Desai is lodged in Taloja jail, Patil and Kakulte are in Arthur Road
jail. The fourth accused, Shitlaprasad Kori, a former BMC chief
engineer, is in police custody.
Last
month, BMC chief engineer Sanjay Darade told the standing committee
that civic engineers did not fully study the structural audit report
submitted in September last year. The admission came after corporators
pointed out that while the report summary said the FOB was in good
condition, the detailed conditional assessment mentioned cracks in the
parapet/railing, staircase being broken, concrete slabs having been
corroded and beams being exposed. It also recommended tests for strength
and durability, but none was conducted by BMC.
The
police have cited a list of 83 witnesses against Desai, who was
contracted by BMC to carry out the structural audit of bridges in south
Mumbai for Rs 65 lakh. During the probe, it emerged that Desai had
subcontracted NDT to Vadodara's Geo Dynamics. The audit report came
almost two years after the contract was given on October 2016. On the
report's delay, Desai's lawyer had said in court after his arrest that
it occurred due to a delay in obtaining certain testing equipment sought
by Desai's firm. "The initial inspection of the FOB was done in
December 2016. There was back and forth with the civic body over the
report, which added to the delay in its submission."
An
official from Geo Dynamics had earlier told TOI, "Our work was limited
to the extent of testing some piles and columns of the staircase. We
were not associated with the entire job of auditing the structure. It
wasn't that the work was sub-contracted to us in anyway."
The Times of India, May 10, 2019